Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Date: 2007-01-09 03:15:26
Message-ID: 200701090315.l093FQZ29456@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> The problem is that this requires two runs even to proof the documentation,
> >> which I think no one wants.
>
> > So what would the API be to signal you want a draft build?
> > gmake DRAFT="Y" html
>
> I'd vote for
>
> gmake draft

OK, I used that syntax (and needed another use of recursion to do it).
Attached.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 4.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 03:19:10 Re: is "add MOVE point" in ToDo valid still?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 02:55:54 Re: pltcl regression failures with ORDER BY ... USING change

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 03:48:02 Re: BCC55 and libpq 8.2
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2007-01-09 02:53:45 Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Index Advisor]