From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-08 17:45:34 |
Message-ID: | 200701081745.l08HjYQ21411@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>>> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
> >>>> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
> >>>> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
> >>>> application/rejection.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
> >>>> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
> >>> You might remember months ago that people were complaining I was pushing
> >>> things into CVS too quickly, so while the patches are in my mailbox,
> >>> they are not in the queue until I feel the community has the time to
> >>> focus on it.
> >> So, there's a queue of patches in your mailbox waiting to get to the
> >> queue? A queue to the queue :). All the patches clearly need review, so
> >> let's not rush them into the CVS, but it'd be nice to have them all in
> >> one queue.
> >
> > Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue
> > is a decision for us. The hold queue additions are less stringent than
> > the main patch queue.
>
> I'm confused, I thought the difference between the pgpatches queue and
> the pgpatches_hold queue is the release the patch is targeted for. If
> there's a third queue for patches that need review before being added to
> another queue, could we have that visible somewhere, so that we know
> what's in it?
Well, sort of. During 8.2 feature freeze the 8.2 hold queue was for
8.3, and the patches queue was for 8.2, but once we started 8.3, they
were both for 8.3.
>
> >> Ps. I agree with the later comments that the naming of the two patch
> >> queues is a bit confusing. Having queues named after the release numbers
> >> the patches are targeted for seems like a good idea.
> >
> > OK, naming suggestions?
>
> The "8.3 patch queue", and the "8.4 patch queue"?
Not really, no, as outlined above.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2007-01-08 17:47:44 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-08 17:43:57 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |