| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
| Date: | 2007-01-07 19:00:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200701072000.41799.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps even more to the point, what makes you think that someone
> will notice the warning? If the docs build is one step in an
> automated build process, this seems unlikely.
Taking a closer look, it's pretty much guaranteed that no one will see
them, because the targets they are attached to are intermediate,
normally followed by latex runs.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-01-07 19:43:30 | Full page writes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-07 18:58:24 | Re: SGML index build fix |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-07 19:53:00 | Re: pg_regress updates for vc++ bulid |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-07 18:58:24 | Re: SGML index build fix |