Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Date: 2007-01-07 04:50:27
Message-ID: 200701070450.l074oR516977@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.
> >
> > This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> > up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> > to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> > Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.
>
> I certainly did not, and it warns only when an invalid HTML.index is
> used.

And the people creating our PDFs didn't know because we often have to
update the web site with valid ones that have indexes.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-07 04:58:26 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-07 04:49:27 Re: SGML index build fix

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-07 04:58:26 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-07 04:49:27 Re: SGML index build fix