Re: pg_ctl options

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl options
Date: 2007-01-06 23:55:37
Message-ID: 200701070055.38087.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > pg_config would need short ones.
>
> Seems we should have some,

But why? What is the use case? It's not like pg_config is a frequently
typed command.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-07 00:02:11 Re: [HACKERS] Allow the identifier length to be increased via a configure option
Previous Message Vanessa V. González D. 2007-01-06 23:30:17 Plannode with a righttree