From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in |
Date: | 2007-01-06 04:01:51 |
Message-ID: | 200701060401.l0641po02755@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow? I would prefer:
> > else if (errno == ERANGE && !isinf(result))
>
> No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
> again ;-)
Actually, when you return ERANGE, what is 'result'? Nan? Inf? finite?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 04:07:37 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow(). |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 03:52:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow(). |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-06 04:05:56 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 03:57:32 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |