Re: TODO: GNU TLS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-31 02:02:36
Message-ID: 200612310202.kBV22aB13977@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
> >
> > That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions"
> > are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be
> > interpreted as the same thing.
>
> Somehow I don't think a statement requiring you to put some guys name
> in all your advertising material is the same as requiring you to
> preserve the copyright notice.

Agreed, but the words "additional restrictions" make no distinction on
the magnitude of additional restrictions.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2006-12-31 02:54:34 Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-31 01:16:45 Re: effective_cache_size vs units