| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Date: | 2006-12-27 14:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200612271428.kBRESPQ16911@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> > documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> > dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> > vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> > patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> > terminology there is no need to change it.
>
> +1
OK. I will adjust any places that still use expired, and put the patch
into the queue.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-27 15:10:47 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Previous Message | mark | 2006-12-27 13:25:39 | Re: Bitmap index thoughts |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-27 15:10:47 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-12-27 13:05:40 | Re: On-disk bitmap index implementation |