From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet(at)amorsen(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Date: | 2006-12-27 09:45:58 |
Message-ID: | 20061227094558.GC15370@www.trapp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:39:22AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> TL> Anyone against making it case-insensitive, speak now or hold your
> TL> peace.
>
> SI-units are inherently case-sensitive [...]
As a notorious lurker, set my weight to one mg (choose the case ;-)
I'd tend to keep case sensitivity, but will hold my peace regardless of
outcome.
Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFkkDWBcgs9XrR2kYRAmKFAJwPMOwl+IbCbMQvszn9RKpXRW3N6ACfbwne
juGsqnMsj2BMyCO+BjP9hq4=
=KCiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dhanaraj M | 2006-12-27 10:02:51 | Allow the identifier length to be increased via a configure option |
Previous Message | Benny Amorsen | 2006-12-27 08:39:22 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |