| From: | Marc Evans <Marc(at)SoftwareHackery(dot)Com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andy Dale <andy(dot)dale(at)gmail(dot)com>, "org(at)kewlstuff(dot)co(dot)za" <org(at)kewlstuff(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication |
| Date: | 2006-12-26 15:30:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20061226102516.B5473@me.softwarehackery.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Shoaib Mir wrote:
>>> We are trying to achieve High Availability over load balancing, so
> basically we always try and have 2 databases in the same state while >>both
> are active,
>
> What problems do you see with Slony + Linux HA combo there? I think a Slony
> failover can do the same and promote a slave node to master in case of a
> master node failure, and then you can actually do the load balancing by
> using the slave nodes in the system.
>
> Please let me know on any updates for OpenSSI if you get a chance to try
> that out
>
> -------------------
> Shoaib Mir
> EnterpriseDB ( www.enterprisedb.com)
I have a simillar problem, such that the HA aspect involves multiple data
centers. I can deploy multiple systems within a single data center and
achieve HA within that data center using the techniques discussed in this
thread. What I have not been able to come up with a good semi-general
purpose solution to is cross-data-center HA. As a result we are using very
application specific techniques to try to address this, but the longer
term maintenance we suspect will be high. How do others deal with this
problem?
- Marc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Murphy | 2006-12-26 17:08:04 | Optimization of unnecessary GROUP BY columns |
| Previous Message | Shoaib Mir | 2006-12-26 15:21:22 | Re: Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication |