From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | Molle Bestefich <molle(dot)bestefich(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: quick review |
Date: | 2006-12-24 05:21:03 |
Message-ID: | 20061224052103.GA22278@www.trapp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:47:42AM +0100, Molle Bestefich wrote:
[...]
> Simply put, a tool with just a single button named "recover
> all the data that you can" is by far the best solution in so
> many cases. Minimal fuzz, minimal downtime, minimal money
> spent on recovery. And perhaps there's even a good chance that
> any missing data could be entered back into the system manually.
I think the point which has been made here was that the recovery tool
*is already there*: i.e. all what can be done as an "one-click" recovery
is done by the system at start-up. Beyond this no cookbook exists (and
thus no way to put it under an one-click procedure).
So this one-click thing would be mainly something to cater for the
"needs" of marketing.
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFjg4/Bcgs9XrR2kYRAtnSAKCCFkB+YAlvbuyhepUnR9/CeG3tsACfb8bE
lCszfmaps1PN1jLMQrc6eLo=
=/6Pa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-12-24 06:19:02 | Re: recent --with-libxml support |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-12-24 02:03:11 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |