From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jim(at)nasby(dot)net, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: New version of money type |
Date: | 2006-12-21 08:21:08 |
Message-ID: | 20061221082108.GC1928@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:44:07PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:22 -0400
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:17:33 -0400
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> > > > Cool. So what do I do with the patch? Should I add the
> > > > currency symbol back in and commit or should I resubmit the
> > > > patch to hackers for further review?
> > >
> > > Well, one thing you definitely *don't* do is commit right now,
> > > because we're in feature freeze, not to mention trying to avoid
> > > forced initdbs now that beta has started. Sit on it till 8.3 is
> > > branched, and
> >
> > OK. I hadn't thought of it as a new feature per se but I
> > understand the initdb issue. Holding at 30,000 feet, ground
> > control.
> >
> > > meanwhile think about what you want to do with the
> > > currency-symbol issue...
> >
> > Personally I don't see a need for it but I am currently in favour
> > of adding it back in before committing just so that we can deal
> > with the issue separately. The same as the other changes being
> > discussed.
>
> Now that 8.3 has been branched shall I go ahead and commit? As
> discussed I will put the currency symbol back in just so that it can
> be discussed and worked on as a completely separate issue. I have
> attached the current patch against HEAD.
I noticed that all your numbers are in English. Is it necessary to
hard-code all that? Also, you're assuming that powers of 10 which are
divisible by 3 are the relevant ones. In China, it's powers of 10
divisible by 4, and in India, it's 0, 1, 2, 3, followed by odd numbers
up through 19.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2006-12-21 08:32:43 | Re: Release 8.2.0 done, 8.3 development starts |
Previous Message | Takayuki Tsunakawa | 2006-12-21 08:14:13 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |