From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Companies Contributing to Open Source |
Date: | 2006-12-20 08:29:09 |
Message-ID: | 20061220082909.GB25949@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:40:12PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think another point you need to bring out more clearily is that
> > the community is also often "miffed" if they feel they have been
> > left out of the design and testing phases. This is sometimes just
> > a reflex that is not always based on technical reasoning. Its just
> > that as you correctly point out are worried of being "high-jacked"
> > by companies.
>
> I hate to mention an emotional community reaction in this document.
You don't have to name it that if you don't want to, although respect
(or at least a good simulation of it) is crucial when dealing with any
person or group. Handing the community a /fait accompli/ is a great
way to convey disrespect, no matter how well-meaning the process
originally was.
> We normally just highlight the inefficiency of a company doing
> things on their own, and the wasted effort of them having to make
> adjustments.
Would it really hurt to touch on some of the "whys" of this?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Childs | 2006-12-20 08:39:34 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-12-20 08:16:32 | Re: Companies Contributing to Open Source |