| From: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
| Date: | 2006-12-14 15:26:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20061214152623.GD29167@mathom.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:03:04PM -0500, Ron wrote:
>What I find interesting is that so far Guido's C2D Mac laptop has
>gotten the highest values by far in this set of experiments, and no
>one else is even close.
>The slowest results, Michael's, are on the system with what appears
>to be the slowest CPU of the bunch; and the ranking of the rest of
>the results seem to similarly depend on relative CPU
>performance. This is not what one would naively expect when benching
>a IO intensive app like a DBMS.
Note that I ran with fsync off, that the data set is <300M, and that all
of the systems (IIRC) have at least 1G RAM. This is exactly the
distribution I would expect since we're configuring the benchmark to
determine whether cpu-specific optimizations affect the results.
Mike Stone
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2006-12-14 16:03:08 | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2006-12-14 15:24:12 | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |