From: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: File Systems Compared |
Date: | 2006-12-06 18:11:53 |
Message-ID: | 20061206181151.GC20976@mathom.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:59:12PM +0100, Arnaud Lesauvage wrote:
>Markus Schiltknecht a écrit :
>>What's common practice? What's it on the pgsql mailing lists?
>
>The netiquette usually advise mailers to wrap after 72 characters
>on mailing lists.
>This does not apply for format=flowed I guess (that's the format
>used in Steinar's message).
It would apply to either; format=flowed can be wrapped at the receiver's
end, but still be formatted to a particular column for readers that
don't understand format=flowed. (Which is likely to be many, since
that's a standard that never really took off.) No wrap netiquette
applies to formatted text blocks which are unreadable if wrapped (such
as bonnie or EXPLAIN output).
Mike Stone
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | asif ali | 2006-12-06 18:37:20 | Re: VACUUM FULL does not works....... |
Previous Message | Erik Jones | 2006-12-06 18:09:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Locking in PostgreSQL? |