Re: psql possible TODO

From: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO
Date: 2006-12-06 06:17:30
Message-ID: 20061206061730.GA2977@mark.mielke.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:56:35PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc wrote:
> >You are saying that typing in 50 commands by hand, adjusting it each time,
> >is efficient?
> >
> >I've done what you are suggesting - I think - I do it with a file. I
> >type "psql -f <filename>". I run it as many times as required.
> >
> >Other times, I keep the 50 command lines in an XEmacs session, and I
> >cut + paste whole paragraphs from XEmacs to psql.
> >
> >By doing this - my work is saved.
> >
> >psql is not an editor session. It will never be an editor session. It
> >will always be a command line. Trying to treat it as an editor session
> >sounds like torture. Augh. :-)
>
> FWIW I tend to use a similar method to this - 'cept the editor is
> usually vim instead of emacs...err..oh dear, emacs vs vi here we come...:-).

Oh no no no...

XEmacs and VIM are both better than command line for anything longer than
a few lines...

Editor? Command line. Hmm... Let me think which will be most productive
for 50 statements that are similar... :-)

Cheers,
mark

--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...

http://mark.mielke.cc/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2006-12-06 06:19:25 Re: psql possible TODO
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-06 05:33:59 Re: psql possible TODO