Re: Performance of ORDER BY

From: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of ORDER BY
Date: 2006-12-05 18:20:28
Message-ID: 20061205182027.GA14718@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

am Tue, dem 05.12.2006, um 13:02:06 -0500 mailte Tom Lane folgendes:
> In 8.0 that might be counterproductively high --- we have seen cases
> where more sort_mem = slower with the older sorting code. I concur
> with Luke's advice that you should update to 8.2 (not 8.1) to get the
> improved sorting code.

Hey, yes, 8.2 is released! Great, and thanks to all the people, which
help to develop this great software.

Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-05 18:39:16 Re: Performance of ORDER BY
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2006-12-05 18:17:33 Re: Performance of ORDER BY