From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Date: | 2006-11-28 23:44:45 |
Message-ID: | 200611282344.kASNijt09203@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
Someone should ask them to remove the article.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> > There is an article about "Lowering the priority of a PostgreSQL query"
> > (http://weblog.bignerdranch.com/?p=11) that explains how to use the
> > setpriority() to lower PostgreSQL processes.
>
> > I?m wondering how much effective it would be for i/o bound systems.
>
> That article isn't worth the electrons it's written on. Aside from the
> I/O point, there's a little problem called "priority inversion". See
> the archives for (many) past discussions of nice'ing backends.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-11-29 01:11:12 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-28 22:58:23 | Re: Collateral for LISA 06 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-11-29 01:11:12 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-11-28 20:31:28 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |