Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas(at)kostyrka(dot)org>, "Carlos H(dot) Reimer" <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Subject: Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction
Date: 2006-11-28 19:45:44
Message-ID: 200611281145.44277.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

All,

The Bizgres project is working on resource management for PostgreSQL. So far,
however, they have been able to come up with schemes that work for BI/DW at
the expense of OLTP. Becuase of O^N lock checking issues, resource
management for OLTP which doesn't greatly reduce overall performance seems a
near-impossible task.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Ellsworth 2006-11-28 20:23:15 Re: Collateral for LISA 06
Previous Message Brad Nicholson 2006-11-28 19:22:52 Re: Integrating Replication into Core

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2006-11-28 20:31:28 Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction
Previous Message Andreas Kostyrka 2006-11-28 19:20:36 Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction