From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | a(dot)mitani(at)sra-europe(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgcluster-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Pgcluster-general] PostgreSQL Documentation of |
Date: | 2006-11-21 03:22:52 |
Message-ID: | 200611210322.kAL3Mqp28549@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> In the very same paper, they define what a Cluster is for them: "A
> cluster is a group of independent servers that cooperate as a single
> system. The primary cluster components are processor nodes, a cluster
> interconnect, and a shared disk subsystem. The clusters share disk
> access and resources that manage data, but the distinct hardware cluster
> nodes do not share memory."
>
> Thus, Oracle RAC seems to be a shared disk solution. Only in conjunction
> with their OCFS, you could probably call it a shared-nothing solution,
> but it's certainly not a shared-memory thing.
>
> I'd vote for explaining these terms in the PostgreSQL documentation, as
> there seems to be a lot of confusion regarding these terms.
OK, but how does explaining the terms help our users?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-11-21 06:38:40 | Re: PostgreSQL Documentation of High Availability and Load Balancing |
Previous Message | anil maran | 2006-11-21 01:59:46 | LOG: logger shutting down |