From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Random() |
Date: | 2006-11-18 17:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 20061118175216.GA1444@a-kretschmer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
am Sat, dem 18.11.2006, um 23:02:33 +0530 mailte Rajesh Kumar Mallah folgendes:
> >select <bigint_column> from <your_table> order by random() limit 1;
>
> This query will tend to get slower as the table grows because of the
> sorting.
Right.
>
> it possible to get a row from a random offset
> how about
>
> select <bigint_column> from <your_table> limit 1 offset 20000*random() ;
For instance, you have a table with only 500 rows and random() returns
0.999? In other words: in think, this is a bad idea, unless you use a
constant for the offset-calculation thats not larger than the number of
rows in this table. For this, you need this value, but select count(1)
from table force a seqscan -> slow.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2006-11-18 17:58:34 | Re: transactional shared variable in postgresql |
Previous Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2006-11-18 17:36:56 | Re: transactional shared variable in postgresql |