Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date: 2006-11-14 17:35:29
Message-ID: 20061114173529.GA90133@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:28:40AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >However, they both want to see their products do well and gain mind and
> >market share. I think our advocacy efforts are severely lacking at the
> >moment, and I'd certainly not be adverse to seeing more effort by both
> >the PG community and the PG corporations to fix this. And yes, MySQL
> >is certainly one of our competitors: saying otherwise is wishful thinking
> >at best.
> >
> I believe you know, that you don't have to convince me that we need
> better advocacy. My point is...
> MySQL in general isn't the target. We don't have to care if you are a
> MySQL or Oracle developer.
> We just need to positively advocate *our* database. The rest will fall
> into place on its own.

Sure, but part of that positioning is educating people on how we're
different than MySQL, since a huge number of developers don't understand
that.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-14 17:45:08 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-14 17:34:12 Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0