From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "surabhi(dot)ahuja" <surabhi(dot)ahuja(at)iiitb(dot)ac(dot)in> |
Cc: | dev(at)archonet(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: help needed, PG 8.0.0 ERROR: index is not a btree is solved in 8.0.9 |
Date: | 2006-11-14 16:40:58 |
Message-ID: | 20061114164058.GG26120@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:58:49PM +0530, surabhi.ahuja wrote:
> hi
> I am using Postgres 8.0.0 and we found this issue "ERROR: index "patient_pkey" is not a btree"
> I have been informed that we should shift to Postgres 8.0.9
I beleive you've asked this a few times already. As a rule it always
best to run the latest minor release, because bugs do get fixed, that's
why there are minor releases.
Do you get this often? Because a reindex fixes it, obviously.
> I have some questions regarding this:
> 1.will this vesion solve the problem that I have mentioned?
No idea.
> 2. If we install postgres 8.1.5 instead of Postgres 8.0.0 I ll have to build my c++ application again right?
I don't think so. I can't imagine why. The client libraries work across
several server versions.
> 3. I am currently using postgresql-8.0-310.jdbc3.jar, for java
> applications. Would I have to change this jar as well? and if yes
> where can I find it?
That's for the backend, right? Or not? If it's for the client end you
shouldn't need to change that either.
> 4. the most important question is : Is there any test case that you ran in order to confirm that the above issue will not occur with PG 8.1.5. I need this test case that I can run in order to propose that we should upgrade to 8.1.5
Do you have a test-case that causes it to happen? That's the only test
there is.
> 5. Can you please provide a link to this Bug. I want to just see the proble, resolution, verification of this bug.
I don't think there's been a bug relating to this. In just about every
case confirmed, it's been memory corruption or disk corruption. As
someone put it:
This [error] says that one of two fields that should never change, in
fixed positions in the first block of a btree index, didn't have the
right values.
No-one has come across an bug that would cause that. Basically, for
more info we need to see the hexdump of the first 8k of the index file
to see why the system thinks it's not a btree. Can you do that?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-11-14 16:45:39 | Re: Using PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2006-11-14 16:30:42 | Re: PgSQL not recognized |