| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| Date: | 2006-10-30 21:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20061030211352.GF16730@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:59:20AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So far, the consensus is that our priorities are as follows:
I don't see any consensus at all. So far, almost everyone who has
had anything to say about this is in fact a member of the funds
group. That makes me pretty uneasy.
> I haven't seen any disagreement with that specific ranking of priorities,
I have: we just had someone objecting to the very idea of either
speaker subsidies or trade show booths. And that was one of the only
people who are not part of the funds group to speak.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-30 21:19:06 | Re: complete success at systems in Munich/Germany |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-10-30 21:04:33 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-10-30 21:45:23 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-10-30 21:11:17 | Re: Postgres derived databases |