| From: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | General PostgreSQL List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall failing from possible corrupted shared memory |
| Date: | 2006-10-27 02:46:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20061027024632.10511.qmail@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> >Worst-case, you can probably fix things by dropping and
> > recreating the constraint or index ...log_min_messages = info but before you do that, I'd
> urge
> > you to try to get as much info as you can about the nature of the
> > catalog corruption. If there's a bug here, as opposed to random
> > cosmic-ray damage, we can't fix it without more info.
I eliminated the non-offending index with this query:
select pg_get_indexdef(indexrelid)
from pg_index
where indexrelid <> 604251 -- this is the index with the problem
order by indexrelid;
How do I go about determining if the crash i caused by faulty hardware or a possible bug?
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-27 03:06:30 | Re: [SQL] Can we convert from Postgres to Oracle !!??? |
| Previous Message | lord.zoltar | 2006-10-27 02:23:17 | arrays of user types. |