On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0400, Chris Campbell wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2006, at 17:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >And what was 1171 doing? I really doubt that either of these could
> >have
> >been pg_dump.
>
> I know that process 1120 is a Java client (Hibernate) running an
> UPDATE query, but I have no idea what 1171 is. I doubt that 1171 was
> pg_dump, but when we turn off the pg_dump cron jobs (for 12-ish
> hours), the deadlocks go away. We usually see 5 or 6 deadlocks spread
> throughout the day. That's not definitive evidence, of course, but
> it's certainly curious.
I seem to remember something funny about hibernate and locking, though I
can't recall any details right now... but searching the archives might
provide insight.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)