| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Date: | 2006-10-25 15:44:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200610251544.k9PFivr27991@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name
> > in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that
> > can be more easily updated.
>
> I agree with that. If we have statements about other projects in our
> docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those
> statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change.
I mention only Slony and pgpool as examples of replication types. They
seem to have risen to high enough visiblity to do that. I have not
mentioned any other solutions.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-25 16:00:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-10-25 15:43:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-25 16:00:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-10-25 15:43:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |