| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is ODBC that slow? |
| Date: | 2006-10-21 02:32:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20061021023211.GA20508@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Our Windows-based db server has to integrate with users that work regularily
> with Access.When attempting to import user's data from Access MDB files to
> PostgreSQL, we try on eof two things: either import using EMS SQL Manager's
> Data Import from Access utility, or export from Access to Postgresql via an
> odbc-based connectionin both cases, the performance is just awful.
> Performance with Tcl's native postgres driver seems rather fine running from
> Windows a Windows client, BTW.
>
> ODBC is often blamed for this sort of thing - I have the 8.01.02 release
> dated 2006.01.31. Everything appears to be at its default setting.
Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
consistently faster than psqlODBC.
http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-10-21 02:39:31 | Re: Slow functional indexes? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-10-21 01:11:14 | Re: Best COPY Performance |