Re: adminpack and pg_catalog

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Date: 2006-10-20 20:59:34
Message-ID: 200610202259.35437.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> Why does adminpack install functions into pg_catalog? This is
> inconsistent with the rest of the contrib/ packages, not to mention
> the definition of pg_catalog itself (which ought to hold builtin
> object definitions).

Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog. AFAICS,
adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave
like all other contrib modules.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Schlossnagle 2006-10-20 21:04:52 Re: xlogdump fixups and WAL log question.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-10-20 20:24:37 Re: xlogdump fixups and WAL log question.