| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Karen Hill" <karen_hill22(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL. |
| Date: | 2006-10-20 19:45:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200610202145.02010.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Karen Hill wrote:
> If you make create a PostgreSQL database that uses PostGIS and you
> distribute that database, than your database (tables, stored
> procedures, views, etc) are GPL?
Nothing ever becomes GPL automatically. You may wish to distribute your
own work under the GPL, but you don't have to.
> Like wise if you create a client
> that connects to that database, do they also become GPL?
Likewise.
> Does
> PostgreSQL in effect become GPL when using PostGIS because PostGIS
> accesses parts of PostgreSQL?
Likewise.
> Npgsql is LGPL. It means you must release the source of Npgsql when
> distributing it, and if you modify Npgsql, but not have to release
> the source under the (L)GPL of the software that calls Npgsql
> functions?
Correct.
> If you provide the source on a CD and the (GPL/LGPL) license as a
> text file on that CD if you distribute, then are your obligations met
> under the GPL/LGPL?
That depends on the distribution methods of the non-source.
> What if those you distribute to lose the source
> code CD, can they then come after you X number of years later
> demanding the source?
No.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-20 19:48:53 | Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL. |
| Previous Message | Karen Hill | 2006-10-20 19:43:36 | Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL. |