| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jungmin shin <jungmin(dot)shin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UDF and cache |
| Date: | 2006-10-18 21:16:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20061018211654.GD85041@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:15:13PM -0400, jungmin shin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I read a paper, which is Query optimization in the presence of Foreign
> Functions.
> And the paper , there is a paragraph like below.
>
> In order to reduce the number of invocations, caching the results of
> invocation was suggested in Postgres.
>
> I'd like to know in detail about how postgres is maintaing the cache of
> UDFs.
It's not. See list archives for past discussions.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-18 21:19:29 | Re: UDF and cache |
| Previous Message | jungmin shin | 2006-10-18 21:15:13 | UDF and cache |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-10-18 21:17:47 | Multiple postmaster + RPM + locale issues |
| Previous Message | jungmin shin | 2006-10-18 21:15:13 | UDF and cache |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-18 21:19:29 | Re: UDF and cache |
| Previous Message | jungmin shin | 2006-10-18 21:15:13 | UDF and cache |