From: | Ioana Danes <ioanasoftware(at)yahoo(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Ioana Danes <ioanasoftware(at)yahoo(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql 8.1.4 - performance issues for select on view using max |
Date: | 2006-10-18 20:34:34 |
Message-ID: | 20061018203434.21060.qmail@web55905.mail.re3.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks a lot I will give it a try.
--- Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le mercredi 18 octobre 2006 21:51, Ioana Danes a
> écrit :
> > I am doing a test for a scenario where I have 2
> > schemas one (public) for the operational data and
> > another one (archive) for old, archived data. So
> > basically I want to split the data from some huge
> > tables in two. All data before 2006 in archive and
> all
> > data after and including 2006 in public.
> [...]
> > I got into a scenario where my plan does not work
> > without doing code change.
>
> This sounds a lot as a ddl partitionning, you may
> want to add some checks to
> your schema and set constraint_exclusion to on in
> your postgresql.conf.
>
> Please read following documentation material :
>
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Dimitri Fontaine
> http://www.dalibo.com/
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-10-18 20:59:22 | Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum on a -mostly- r/o table |
Previous Message | Joshua Marsh | 2006-10-18 20:21:05 | Re: Postgresql 8.1.4 - performance issues for select on view using max |