From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Indira Muthuswamy <indumuthu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug? |
Date: | 2006-10-18 18:43:47 |
Message-ID: | 20061018184346.GG85041@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Moving to -sql.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:53:46PM +0530, Indira Muthuswamy wrote:
> Hai,
>
> I have encountered a problem with PostgreSQL.I have created a table
> 'tab1' with a column 'a' with serial type.I entered 20 records into the
> table.So the query
> select max(a) from tab1;
> returned 20.When I tried the same query after the command
> truncate table tab1;
> I found that the output of the first query as
>
> max
> -----
>
> (1 row)
> When I tried to insert a new row into the table tab1 I found that the
> value at column a incremented to the value 21.
> But I heard from my friends that the value of the serial column gets
> decremented whenever we issue the 'truncate table' command (in MS SQL
> SERVER).Is the concept same with PostgreSQL or not?Can anyone clarify me on
> this?
Your friends are mistaken. TRUNCATE does nothing to affect sequences.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-10-18 18:52:06 | Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-10-18 18:43:32 | Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-18 23:18:37 | Re: hi i want help on levels |
Previous Message | Andy | 2006-10-18 13:49:32 | plpgsql record as parameter ??? |