| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal |
| Date: | 2006-10-13 22:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200610131557.24420.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Jim,
> Well, that's not what I said (my point being that until the planner and
> stats are perfect you need a way to over-ride them)... but I've also
> never said hints would be faster or easier than stats modification (I
> said I hope they would).
Yes, you did. Repeatedly. On this and other threads, you've made the
statement at least three times that per-query hints are the only way to go
for 8.3. Your insistence on this view has been so strident that if I
didn't know you better, I would assume some kind of hidden agenda.
Stop harping on the "per-query hints are the true way and the only way", or
prepare to have people start simply ignoring you.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-13 22:59:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-10-13 22:38:51 | Re: [PATCHES] index advisor |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-13 22:59:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-10-13 18:07:17 | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |