Re: test_fsync on MinGW(win32)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: test_fsync on MinGW(win32)
Date: 2006-10-13 14:19:27
Message-ID: 200610131419.k9DEJR324334@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I wanted to see this difference. It is somewhat ad hoc.
> However, It is more effective than it doesn't show it at all.
>
> -- MinGW(win32) --
> $ test_fsync
> Simple write timing:
> write 3.644000
>
> Compare fsync times on write() and non-write() descriptor:
> (If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
> on a different descriptor.)
> write, fsync, close 40.543000
> write, close, fsync 47.033000
>
> Compare one o_sync write to two:
> (o_sync unavailable)
> open o_dsync, write 0.094000
>
> (fdatasync unavailable)
> write, fsync, 26.700000
>
> Compare file sync methods with 2 8k writes:
> open o_dsync, write 0.203000
> (fdatasync unavailable)
> write, fsync, 27.920000
>
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-13 15:33:43 Re: [HACKERS] array_accum aggregate
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-13 13:56:09 Re: [HACKERS] array_accum aggregate