Re: On status data and summaries

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On status data and summaries
Date: 2006-10-12 17:53:27
Message-ID: 20061012175327.GC29203@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:20:43AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> use a wiki to track open development items, with some status, like I did
> for the open items list for 8.2. I usually only do that during feature
> freeze, but could expand it and open it up for others to edit.

So do I understand this as a suggestion to pick some threads, keep
track of them, but otherwise shut up until feature freeze? That's
ok with me, if that's what helps; but I was under the impression from
the meta-discussion last time that people didn't think that was
working. Anyone?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
If they don't do anything, we don't need their acronym.
--Josh Hamilton, on the US FEMA

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2006-10-12 17:55:26 Re: New version of money type
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-12 17:45:03 Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal