| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle(at)freenet(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Storing images in PostgreSQL databases (again) |
| Date: | 2006-10-12 17:38:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20061012133837.c6099e92.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle(at)freenet(dot)de>:
> Am 2006-10-05 21:22:04, schrieb Gregory S. Williamson:
>
> > a sufficiently large hash (MD5 for instance). Of course, there's
>
> I do this already but have problems since I have
> stored arround 130 million files on a server...
>
> > time to create the hash which might be an issue in a high volume
> > system. Extending a hash with some other data (date ?) can
>
> MD5 hashes are 32 Bytes long, maybe they change
> it to 64 Bytes?
>
> I have already over 2000 collisions and checked
> it, that the files are NOT the same.
Try sha1 or sha256.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Tassonis | 2006-10-12 17:40:42 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-10-12 17:37:42 | Re: Override system-defined cast? |