Re: On status data and summaries

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On status data and summaries
Date: 2006-10-12 11:14:36
Message-ID: 20061012111436.GB28443@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:26:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Funny, sounds like what I usually do. I welcome the assistance.

Well, yes, that was my impression too. The complaint in the thread
that started all this, as I understood it, was that there were big,
hairy features that tended to have long discussions about them, and
very few people among even the committers seemed to have a clear idea
of exactly where things stood at the end of coding.

But I take Jim Nasby's point, that the request for monitoring isn't
going to come. How about an alternative: _you_ delegate
threads/features/whatever to me to watch? Would that help? (I don't
care how we do it, so long as it would be helpful and so long as it's
wanted.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Unfortunately reformatting the Internet is a little more painful
than reformatting your hard drive when it gets out of whack.
--Scott Morris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-12 11:22:44 Hints (was: Index Tuning Features)
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-10-12 10:58:46 Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features