| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On status data and summaries |
| Date: | 2006-10-12 11:14:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20061012111436.GB28443@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:26:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Funny, sounds like what I usually do. I welcome the assistance.
Well, yes, that was my impression too. The complaint in the thread
that started all this, as I understood it, was that there were big,
hairy features that tended to have long discussions about them, and
very few people among even the committers seemed to have a clear idea
of exactly where things stood at the end of coding.
But I take Jim Nasby's point, that the request for monitoring isn't
going to come. How about an alternative: _you_ delegate
threads/features/whatever to me to watch? Would that help? (I don't
care how we do it, so long as it would be helpful and so long as it's
wanted.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Unfortunately reformatting the Internet is a little more painful
than reformatting your hard drive when it gets out of whack.
--Scott Morris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-10-12 11:22:44 | Hints (was: Index Tuning Features) |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-10-12 10:58:46 | Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features |