David,
> Then they should have mentioned it. PostgreSQL has real issues, and
> if they'd mentioned any one of these, it would have been reasonable.
> Instead, these guys chose to spread the FUD around and call PostgreSQL
> a toy.
That's not how I read the article. They recommended PostgreSQL for "edge"
applications, which is the conventional opinion on Open Source databases.
From my perspective, it's a positive article for us: "Try PostgreSQL, you
might like it."
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco