| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Date: | 2006-09-25 23:20:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200609260120.22601.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The reason with the shared_buffers is that the detection code in
> > initdb has 400kB as minimum value, and it would be pretty
> > complicated to code the detection code to handle both kB and MB
> > units. If someone wants to try it, though, please go ahead.
>
> What about 0.4MB?
That isn't valid code, so I don't know how that helps.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Casey Duncan | 2006-09-25 23:44:31 | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-09-25 23:16:37 | Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Casey Duncan | 2006-09-25 23:44:31 | Re: Questions about guc units |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-09-25 23:16:37 | Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests |