Re: Questions about guc units

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions about guc units
Date: 2006-09-25 23:20:22
Message-ID: 200609260120.22601.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The reason with the shared_buffers is that the detection code in
> > initdb has 400kB as minimum value, and it would be pretty
> > complicated to code the detection code to handle both kB and MB
> > units. If someone wants to try it, though, please go ahead.
>
> What about 0.4MB?

That isn't valid code, so I don't know how that helps.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Casey Duncan 2006-09-25 23:44:31 Re: Questions about guc units
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-09-25 23:16:37 Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Casey Duncan 2006-09-25 23:44:31 Re: Questions about guc units
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-09-25 23:16:37 Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests