Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
Date: 2006-09-24 04:26:55
Message-ID: 20060924042654.GA7165@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:

> >I asked around inside Red Hat but haven't gotten any responses yet ...
> >seeing that it's a rather old Suse kernel, I can understand that RH's
> >kernel hackers might not be too excited about investigating. (Alan Cox,
> >for one, has got other things to worry about this weekend:
> >http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/%7etelsa/boom/
>
> Uhmm... doh?

Telsa got "fired" for buying IBM?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-09-24 06:13:51 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-09-24 04:11:03 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES