From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
Date: | 2006-09-23 19:56:04 |
Message-ID: | 20060923195604.GD24323@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> To my mind the real problem is that one of the principal output formats
> we are interested in is HTML, and there is no dotless-i entity in any
> version of the HTML standard. I trust I need not point out again the
> difference between "my browser recognizes this construct" and "it's in
> the standard".
Sure there is, HTML4 includes all of Unicode, thus also the dotless-i.
They gave up assigning names to them after latin1, but numerical
references are in the standard also (decimal and hex).
I created a simple docbook document on my computer with ı and
ran openjade over and in the output file it is converted to ı.
Openjade knows how to generate valid character references. The input
file is attached, I compiled it with the command:
openjade -V draft-mode -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -i output-html -t sgml /tmp/a.sgml
For dsl file just copy the stylesheet.dsl file in the postgresql source
tree.
Why it doesn't work in the current docs I don't know, but I think we can
rule out limitations of HTML or Docbook.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
a.sgml | text/plain | 412 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-23 20:18:11 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
Previous Message | User Dpage | 2006-09-23 18:48:06 | pginstaller - pginst: Update GUIDs, bump version string for beta 1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2006-09-23 20:08:14 | Re: Fwd: Is the fsync() fake on FreeBSD6.1? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-23 18:35:24 | Re: Fwd: Is the fsync() fake on FreeBSD6.1? |