Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Date: 2006-09-23 14:07:01
Message-ID: 20060923140701.GC24323@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 08:49:02AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> That's not how I understand it. The document encoding is only related
> to how high-bit characters are interpreted, I am told by Peter, but for
> some reason the toolchain just doesn't support UTF8, even though if you
> use &#305; in SGML it does come out right in HTML, but new toolchains
> throw an error for it.

Dunno about UTF-8, but openjade only supports one character repertoire,
and that's Unicode (under character handling in the man page).

According to the docbook reference, a way to specify the dotless i
is &inodot;

http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/documentation/reference/html/iso-lat2.html

But it's part of Latin-2, and if your stylesheet declares latin1 as
the only valid characters, then that character is invalid, no matter
how you represent it. I was just surprised, because &inodot; has been
part of docbook since version 3, which is quite some time ago now.

So to me (a more docbook novice) it seems like it's the stylesheet
that's limiting you to latin1, not the docbook parser.

Anyway, the problem has been solved, so we can all get back to testing
the beta now.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-23 16:27:51 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-23 12:49:02 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-23 16:27:51 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-23 12:49:02 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i