From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Kelly <akelly(at)corisweb(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgresql rising |
Date: | 2006-09-22 17:02:31 |
Message-ID: | 20060922170230.GJ28987@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:10 -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
> > Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > > I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
> > > related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
> > > apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on postgresql...Vonage
> > > is one example:
> > >
> > That is good news, I wish there where some of those Postgresql jobs in
> > the Milwaukee area :-)
> > Don't want to move to NJ :-(
> >
> > It does seem to be a grass roots kind of thing as the major corp
> > managers have no clue what Postgresql is.
> > For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
> > Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the more they think it is what
> > they need :-)
>
> Hmmm...
> I'm broke.
>
> I'd be happy to wrap a sexy, colorful, pointy-clicky installer around
> postgreSQL and then market the whole package to the corporate world with
> 5 and 6 figure annual site deployment fees. I'll even funnel half back
> into core devel.
> It wouldn't even be the exploitation of profound stupidity, it would be
> catering to the needs and desires of the corporate customer.
So why don't you?
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-09-22 17:03:03 | Re: postgresql rising |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-09-22 17:01:44 | Re: postgresql rising |