From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads(at)pgug(dot)de>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: About docbot |
Date: | 2006-09-22 02:10:52 |
Message-ID: | 20060922021052.GB3402@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:41:58PM -0700, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> Sounds iffy to me. Lending the hostname makes this an official (or
> officially endorsed) thing. Would it be branded and such the same
> as the main website?
Not necessarily. The current (non-working) site on pgfoundry looks
like this:
http://docbot.projects.postgresql.org/
Just to be clear, no one has suggested that this include write
operations. The known ways to write to that the keyword search are:
1. Be an identified user on freenode and in the docbot's list of
authorized users.
2. Directly execute SQL on its database.
I'd recommend against adding more write methods.
> Would core www- team people have access to it such as Dave, Magnus,
> Robert etc?
If they really want it. I have commit bits on -www, and already have
write access as above.
> How is content controlled and would we have any ability to make sure
> the image and content agrees with how the project presents itself?
So far (3 years, give or take) there have been just two controversial
URLs: one for fsm which pointed to venganza.org, which I removed at
Jan Wieck's request on grounds of its political nature, and one for
google which contains an unromantic Saxon-derived word denoting
lovemaking, which is still there as far as I know.
> I pm'ed the bot and it didn't respond to me
pg_docbot takes commands in pm phrased precisely as you would phrase
them in channel.
> so I'm not sure exactly the context of what it does, but if it's
> like rtfm_please, I don't know what it offers that the documentation
> section of the main site doesn't offer.
It offers keyword searches that people have found useful. People
frequently paste docbot responses into the -general mailing list.
> I don't want to rain on anyones parade, just offering my 2 cents.
Thanks for helping clarify the situation :)
Cheers,
D
>
> Gavin
>
> On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >What do we think about the below guys?
> >
> >Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> >>Hello Joshua,
> >>we talked today about a docbot subdomain.
> >>The current situation is, that pg_docbot (more precise his instance
> >>pg_docbot_ads) is on 10 PostgreSQL channels. Now we would like to
> >>implement a web interface for the bot to show some information and
> >>to have a search form which would give back results from the same
> >>database the bot is using.
> >>Picking up your idea from earlier today i would like to ask you, if
> >>it is possible to get a subdomain like docbot.postgresql.org pointing
> >>to the server the bot is running on.
> >>Thank you for your help.
> >>Kind regards
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> >Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> > http://www.commandprompt.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of
> >broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-22 07:24:42 | Re: Who admins DNS? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-09-22 01:47:32 | Re: Who admins DNS? |