From: | Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: execute/perform and FOUND |
Date: | 2006-09-21 11:19:41 |
Message-ID: | 20060921111941.GC10331@merkur.hilbert.loc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:06:32PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> gives the result below. It seems inconsistent to me with
> regard to the FOUND variable. I would expect FOUND to always
> be false regardless of whether I use EXECUTE or PERFORM. I
> certainly do not expect it to be true for the third EXECUTE
> even assuming that PERFORM may have a bug. What is it that I
> am missing out on here ?
> select * from test;
> fk_item
> ---------
> (0 Zeilen)
>
> select test();
> psql:00-test.sql:33: NOTICE: running: select 1 from test where fk_item=1324314
> psql:00-test.sql:33: NOTICE: found (execute 1): f
> psql:00-test.sql:33: NOTICE: found (execute 2): f
> psql:00-test.sql:33: NOTICE: found (perform): t
> psql:00-test.sql:33: NOTICE: found (execute 3): t
...
> begin
> cmd := ''select 1 from test where fk_item=1324314'';
> raise notice ''running: %'', cmd;
>
> execute cmd;
And, no, in the actual situation I cannot get rid of the
execute or perform because I need a dynamically generated
query. It's just that the example presented here was reduced
to a static query that could simply be ran as is, too.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-21 11:32:02 | Re: execute/perform and FOUND |
Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2006-09-21 11:15:46 | Re: execute/perform and FOUND |