From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | andrew(at)supernews(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta) |
Date: | 2006-09-20 01:39:13 |
Message-ID: | 20060920013913.GA22242@mark.mielke.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:02:40PM -0000, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> On 2006-09-19, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> wrote:
> > Different UUID forms can be unique within their domain. As long as I
> > control the MAC address assignment for all of my units, my MAC address
> > can be guaranteed to be unique across space and time,
> You do not know (and can never know) that no-one else is using the same
> MAC address. Anyone with substantial experience in networking will tell
> you that the supposed "uniqueness" of manufacturer-assigned MACs is often
> a myth, with (in extreme cases) entire batches of NICs being manufactured
> with the same assigned MAC.
I have the impression I'm not being heard.
*I* control the MAC address assignment for all of *MY* units.
Clear? :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Naz Gassiep | 2006-09-20 02:15:43 | Re: vista |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-09-20 00:42:45 | Re: polite request about syntax |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-20 01:40:57 | Re: More doc patches |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-09-20 01:30:18 | Re: More doc patches |