Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Date: 2006-09-17 00:08:43
Message-ID: 20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.

Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-17 00:44:48 Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-09-16 23:46:04 Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected