From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Draft release notes |
Date: | 2006-09-14 21:25:47 |
Message-ID: | 200609142125.k8ELPlQ05778@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> My memory says this was eventually removed, even though it was committed
> >> for a time. Am I wrong?
> >> - Make EXPLAIN sampling smarter, to avoid excessive sampling delay
> >> (Martijn van Oosterhout)
>
> > I see a reversion for EXPLAIN ANALYZE only:
>
> > date: 2006/06/09 19:30:56; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +27 -172
> > Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too
> > unreliable because node timing is much less predictable than the patch
> > expects. I kept the API change for InstrStopNode, however.
>
> > so the item is probably still OK.
>
> No, Simon is right, that entry should be removed --- there's nothing
> interesting left of the patch :-(
I see. Removed.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-14 21:32:09 | Re: Opinion wanted on UUID/GUID datatype output formats. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-09-14 21:24:54 | Re: Mid cycle release? |