Re: Not-so-open items

Tom Lane wrote:
> There are several entries on the 8.2 open-items list that I think can be
> removed:
>
> Fix backward array comparison - subset
>
> Done (this was redundant with the containment-operator item)

OK, that wasn't clear to me.

> Store only active XIDs in subtransaction cache
>
> Per my note just now, this probably should wait for 8.3.

OK, added to TODO.

> Double vacuum speed on tables with no indexes
>
> I changed the locking thing I was worried about. Unless Greg wants to
> do some real-world performance measurements to confirm or refute that
> change, I think this can be closed.

OK, removed.

>
> Fix excessive page checking for new btree split code
>
> Per my note yesterday, I can't reproduce the misbehavior I saw six weeks
> ago, so I recommend we leave the code alone.

OK, removed.

> Suppress error on bind parameters of unknown types
>
> I haven't heard one single person speak up to say "yeah, that's a good
> idea", so I conclude it probably isn't. Recommend we not change it.

OK, removed.

> BTW, pushing out an 8.1.5 is probably a good idea, but what's it doing
> in the 8.2 open-items list? Especially in the "documentation" section?

It is something that has to happen before final release, but is not a
_code_ item, so I threw it there.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +